Questions Before ConcreteData centres in England and Wales

Have your say by 8 January 2027

The UK Government’s draft policy for data centres is open for comment. It applies to England, but it is likely to shape what happens in Wales, which has no policy of its own. We found nothing in it to protect households in a drought or a power shortage.

The Treasury’s Data Centre Covenant, published the same day, applies in Wales and offers “strategic” data centres faster access to the grid.

The draft policy and how to respond What the Covenant means for Wales

Data centres in England and Wales

Ask the questions before the concrete is poured.

Data centres are being planned at a pace set by the race to build AI. The decisions that matter most — water, power, chemicals, who controls the data — are often settled long before anyone asks the people who live with the result. This site sets out those questions, in plain English, so that anyone can ask them in time.

Illustration of a large data centre in a green valley beside a river and reservoir, with pylons and houses nearby.
Illustration, not a real site.

Why timing is everything

A data centre's biggest effects are fixed early: where it goes, how it is cooled, which chemicals protect it, how much power and water it reserves. By the time a planning application is published, many of those answers have already been given — by default, and in private. That is why this site asks its questions before designs are finalised and long before anything is built.

Most room to change thingsLeast room
  1. Site search and land deal

    Where it goes, and on what terms.

    locationwater catchmentgrid routeland lease terms
  2. Power and water agreements

    Capacity is reserved long before plans are drawn.

    grid connectionwater supplywho pays for upgrades
  3. Design

    The engineering choices that set impacts for decades.

    cooling typefire-suppression chemicalsbackup generatorsbuilding size
  4. Public consultation usually starts here

    Planning application

    Often the first the public hears of it.

    EIA or notconditionscommunity benefit
  5. Construction

    Two to three years of building.

    trafficnoisetemporary jobs
  6. Operation

    Twenty years or more, day and night.

    water and power drawgenerator testingreporting
  7. End of life

    Rarely discussed at all.

    decommissioningchemical removale-waste

This is a simplified picture drawn for this site. The order varies from project to project, and in Wales developers of major schemes must consult the community before submitting an application — but even that usually comes after the site, the power and the basic design have been chosen.

The issues

Nine issues drawn from the paper “Beyond Planning Permission”, plus a real case study. Each page follows the same pattern: what is at stake, what we know, what nobody has yet answered, the questions to ask, and what you can do. Each issue has a short, simple guide and an in-depth page with the full text of the paper.

Water

Cooling, drought and who gets cut off first

How much water on the hottest day of a drought, and who is cut off first?

Paper section 5Simple · In depth

Power and the grid

Electricity demand, carbon and who pays for upgrades

Who pays for the grid upgrades, and what else waits in the queue?

Paper section 4, 6, 7Simple · In depth

Chemicals and the local environment

PFAS 'forever chemicals', noise, heat and decommissioning

Which chemicals will be stored on site, and what happens to them in 30 years?

Paper section 8Simple · In depth

Who really benefits

Jobs, tax, and whether the investment will happen

How many permanent local jobs, once construction ends?

Paper section 3Simple · In depth

Who controls the data

Sovereignty, foreign law and dependence on foreign providers

If your records are stored here, whose law ultimately applies?

Paper section 9 to 13Simple · In depth

Resilience and concentration

Backups, single points of failure and clustering

What happens when too much depends on too few sites?

Paper section 14, 15Simple · In depth

AI and the precautionary principle

What the builders of AI themselves are warning about

What evidence would move government from precaution to reassurance?

Paper section 17Simple · In depth

How decisions are made

Planning law in England and Wales, and who decides

Who actually decides, and when does the public get a say?

Paper section 2Simple · In depth

Who is affected?

When the "neighbour" lives miles away on the same water or grid

Should people sharing the same reservoir or grid be consulted?

Paper section 18Simple · In depth

Case study: Bro Tathan

Where several of these issues meet on one real site in the Vale of Glamorgan

What was decided before the public was asked?

Paper section 16Simple · In depth

Case study: Cardiff East

A 150 MW data centre with its own gas power station, beside the A48

Has the environment been properly assessed? Comments close 28 October.

NewCase study

Where we stand

This site is not against data centres. They carry our medical records, our banking and our public services, and some will be built here. It is against decisions of this size being made quickly, privately, and on the strength of the developer’s own figures. We ask for evidence before consent, not reassurance after it.

We try hard to separate what is known from what is not. Where a claim rests on a source, the source is linked. Where it rests on our own reasoning, we say so. Read the frequently asked questions.